EV Charging for New Public Sites: Guide for Planners

May 26, 2026
EV Charging for New Public Sites Guide for Planners

20 million. That’s the number of EVs that were sold in 2025, 22% of total vehicle sales in that year. The current sales in 2026 have already crossed 17 million worldwide, India alone contributing 2 million. In a few years, it won’t be surprising if every 3rd vehicle on the road is an EV. And as the number of EVs grows, so does the demand for EV charging.

The demand for EV charging hubs is increasing

Things are changing and they are changing fast. EV Charging hubs are becoming a normal part of commercial parking, fleet operations, and community infrastructure. While public chargers have already crossed 5 million worldwide, and around 30,000 in India, it still needs to expand much faster to keep up with vehicle growth. In other words, EV charging infrastructure is becoming a deployment speed problem, not a future demand one.

AC charging is a good option for homes and other locations that permit overnight or around 3-4 hours of charging time. However, large-scale vehicle management needs quicker options, which is why DC fast charging is used commercially in EV charging stations, but it often runs into problems, especially in the building and retrofitting stage.

EV charging hubs are impacted by 3 things

The difficulty in building a charging hub is rarely in the EV charger itself. The friction sits around the charger: utility approval, available space, and uncertainty about utilization. The following 3 issues often appear together, and each one makes the next decision more difficult.

1. Getting necessary grid approvals is tedious

DC fast charging increases electrical demand quickly. Even for commercial sites that support 24*7 lighting, lifts, and other such big loads, a much larger sanctioned supply is needed once fast charging is added. That creates a multi-step approval process with utilities, design teams, and site owners, and the work often slows down because each party is managing different constraints. The issue is not just the approval timeline and fragmented management. It is also the mismatch between what a site wants to deploy and what the grid can realistically provide, which is why, even an approval doesn’t guarantee success.

2. Dense urban areas might not have space for new utilities

Retrofit sites often have limited space for additional electrical rooms, longer cable runs, or oversized civil works. That means the site may have demand but not the physical space to support a large EV charging layout. Constrained parking geometry, shared drive lanes, and existing underground utilities are some of the things rhat reduce flexibility.  

This constraint matters because the first charger is usually the hardest one to place. If the installation requires a major rework of bays, conduits, or circulation paths, the operator may postpone the project or reduce scope.

3. Utilization might be quite non-uniform

Concerns around utilization and ROI is the primary deterrent of most EV charging infrastructure investors. Some sites fill only in the evening. Some mixed-use properties have fluctuated demand across the day. Some community sites serve EVs, ICE vehicles, and non-vehicle purposes in the same bay pattern. That makes it difficult for a new operator to know whether the EV charger will run often enough to recover the investment.  

This is why low-stake sites need flexible infrastructure. The operator should be able to start with a smaller deployment, observe demand, and add capacity only when the data supports it.  

A site with uneven traffic does not need maximum power on day 1, it needs a charger architecture that can move with demand.

Therefore, the first few EV chargers in a charging hub should be treated less like a final infrastructure decision and more like an evidence-gathering step that can validate price points, dwell time, and repeat traffic.

And this would need better-fit EV chargers.

EV charging equipment must be compact and dynamic

Compact EV charging hardware reduces the civil burden on the site, and dynamic power sharing reduces the risk of locking capital into unused capacity.

Slimmer EV chargers are easier to install and maintain

A slimmer EV charger is better suited to sites that need to preserve circulation, protect a premium parking layout, or start with a single installation before committing to a larger hub.  It can reduce how much bay space is sacrificed, how much conduit work is needed, and how disruptive the installation. For new CPOs, parking or community charging operators testing demand, this lower footprint makes the project easier to approve internally and easier to adapt later.

Ring Topology enables power management for both high and low utilization

Low-utilization sites start difficult because they need commercial credibility before they need high absolute power. Oversized systems can create the wrong economics: too much capex, too much upstream planning, and too much capacity sitting idle. EV charging topology, which in simple terms means how chargers are connected with each other, can be used very intelligently here.  In the case of ring topology, two EV chargers can work together as one coordinated system when the site needs more power.  

How is this useful?  

Let’s take an example of our product Slim 60.

SLIM 60 2.0

Ring Topology Ready DC Fast Charger

Scale your deployment as charging demand grows across public sites, fleets, and commercial hubs.

Standalone Mode

Start with a compact 60 kW unit and expand infrastructure as real usage data emerges.

Scalable Deployment

Built for sites that need flexible power growth without overbuilding from day one.

Explore Slim 60 2.0 →

In standalone mode, this EV charger delivers up to 60 kW. When paired, the system scales to 120 kW through charger-to-charger boost mode. Now, a CPO does not need to choose between a small pilot and a large final build. The site can begin with one unit, prove utilization, and then connect a second unit when high demand is seen. The additional charger is not wasted if demand remains low, because the system still operates in standalone mode.  

In practical terms, ring topology supports three operating ideas:

  • Start with a single 60 kW unit where the site is still proving demand.  
  • Add a second unit when you see repeat traffic.  
  • Use the paired 120 kW mode when one charger needs stronger supply without having to change anything much on the site.

Where is this model most useful?

Site type What the operator needs Why Slim 60 2.0 fits
Parking pilot A charger that can serve existing demand without having to fundamentally redesign the lot Compact footprint and a staged power path reduce first-phase risk
New CPO launch site A commercial offer that works before the network reaches scale 60 kW standalone mode supports a credible opening case
Community charging hub Flexibility across mixed users and uneven traffic Ring topology allows expansion to 120 kW when demand rises
Urban retrofit site Minimal civil disruption and preserved parking geometry Slimmer hardware is easier to place in constrained layouts
Fleet-adjacent public site Repeatable charging with room to grow Boost mode helps meet peak demand without a full redesign

Slim 60 2.0 is designed for sites that need compact DC fast charging, staged utilisation, and a practical route to higher power without building oversized upstream infrastructure from day one.

In essence, the main question is not whether DC fast charging is worth investing in. It is whether the EV charger can fit the site, satisfy early demand, and leave room for growth.

Interesting in exploring further?  Let’s talk here.

Share

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average commercial EV charging station cost for a new pilot project?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse.

Initial setup costs often spike due to heavy civil rworks, grid expansion, and oversized hardware. For new CPOs and parking operators launching a pilot, starting with a compact 60 kW DC fast charger significantly lowers upfront capital risk. By avoiding immediate, large-scale transformer upgrades and utilizing existing electrical room footprints, operators can gather empirical data on driver dwell times and vehicle traffic patterns before committing to capital-intensive network expansions.
How can I build a profitable EV charging business model if my site's utilization is unpredictable?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse.

Unpredictable utilization is the primary challenge for new commercial installations. A successful strategy uses flexible, modular infrastructure rather than static, oversized systems that sit idle during non-peak hours. Implementing hardware built on innovative ring topology allows you to scale from a single 60 kW installation to a paired 120 kW booster configuration only after consistent demand is established, ensuring your capital investment scales in direct alignment with real-world revenue generation.
What space constraints should property managers consider when deploying commercial EV charging solutions?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse.

Traditional DC fast chargers demand substantial parking bay geometry adjustments, long conduit pathways, and dedicated civil utility blocks. When retrofitting established commercial spaces or dense urban lots, selecting slimmer EV hardware prevents the loss of premium parking stalls and circulation pathways. Compact physical profiles ensure seamless architectural integration with minimal civil disruption, lowering internal approval barriers for site owners.
Why is grid approval a bottleneck for commercial DC fast charger installations, and how can it be mitigated?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse.

High-power DC fast charging exponentially increases a commercial property's sanctioned electrical load, resulting in multi-party utility delays and infrastructure mismatches. You can mitigate these grid constraints by deploying smart power management systems. Utilizing dynamic charger-to-charger boost modes allows low-stake properties to capture early market share with standard grid constraints, providing high absolute power only when peak vehicle demands require it without completely restructuring the local electrical framework.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse.

Recent Blogs

View all

How to Start an EV Charging Business in India - Complete Guide

Quality Control and Traceability in manufacturing of EV chargers

Exicom’s Industry 4.0 Path to Zero-Defect EV Chargers

We use cookies to make your experience on our website better. By clicking on “Accept All”, you are agreeing for cookies to be used. More information.