SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)

What are SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)?

The SDGs tend to enter conversations already overburdened. They come wrapped in frameworks, colour palettes, and expectations to “align,” long before anyone pauses to ask whether alignment is actually happening or just being declared.

At a basic level, the goals describe conditions most societies recognise as improvements. Cleaner environments. Safer work. More stable systems. The language is global, but the ideas themselves are ordinary.

The goals are broad because they were never meant to describe exact actions. They sit in the background, shaping conversations rather than directing them.

SDG mapping method

The method is straightforward and focuses on everyday activity rather than abstract sustainability language.

• List everyday business activities
  
  • Start with what actually happens. Energy use, procurement, logistics, operations, workforce practices, and how products or services are used after sale.
• Identify where impact shows up
  
  • Look at how those activities affect people, resources, or systems. Some impacts are direct and visible. Others appear further along the value chain.
• Match activities to relevant SDG targets
  
  • Focus on specific SDG targets rather than broad goals. Targets make the connection clearer and reduce vague alignment.
• Narrow the list deliberately
  
  • Avoid mapping everything. Select fewer SDGs where the link is strongest and most defensible. Depth matters more than coverage.
• Test the logic
  
  • Ask whether the connection would still make sense without icons or branding. If the explanation feels thin, the alignment probably is.
• Document assumptions and boundaries
  
  • Clarify what is included, what is excluded, and why. This keeps the mapping usable over time.

Turning impact materiality into SDGs

Material issues tend to repeat themselves. The same concerns surface across years, audits, and discussions, even when the language changes.

SDG alignment is less about matching terms and more about acknowledging what those issues lead to. Energy use does not remain confined to operations. Labour practices do not exist in isolation. Outcomes extend outward.

Not all connections are clean. Some remain partial. That lack of neatness is often where the real insight sits.

KPI mapping

Measurement introduces friction, which is usually where alignment slows.

Data exists, but not always in a consistent form. Definitions shift. Boundaries change. Numbers improve in one area while staying flat in another.

Simple indicators tracked repeatedly tend to reveal more than complex systems that reset each year. Where estimates appear, explanation matters more than refinement.

Reporting frameworks (GRI / SASB / ISSB)

The SDGs are often placed alongside reporting frameworks, though they serve different roles.

GRI focuses on describing effects. SASB introduces industry context and financial relevance. ISSB narrows attention to sustainability-related risks and opportunities tied to enterprise value.

None of these systems resolves ambiguity on its own. Together, they reduce the risk that the SDGs become abstract references without substance.

Avoiding SDG-washing

SDG-washing rarely announces itself. It appears through excess.

Too many goals. Broad language. Repeated claims without movement. The presentation improves while the underlying story stays the same.

More durable alignment tends to look restrained. Fewer declarations. Slower shifts. Occasional acknowledgement that progress did not happen as planned.

How does EV charging help with SDGs?

EV charging is often described as a solution before its conditions are examined.

Electricity sourcing shapes outcomes. Infrastructure planning matters. Battery lifecycle considerations change the long-term picture. The charger alone explains very little.

Where these surrounding factors are addressed, links to cleaner air, lower emissions, and urban mobility become clearer. Where they are not, the contribution remains limited.

How to communicate SDG impact?

Communication usually reveals intent more clearly than statements.

Repeated priorities suggest seriousness. Stable metrics suggest discipline. Gradual movement suggests follow-through.

Over time, consistency does more work than emphasis. The absence of novelty often signals that alignment has moved beyond presentation.

FAQs

What does SDG alignment mean?
Linking business activities to relevant SDG targets. Showing where real-world impact actually occurs, not just intent.

How do companies map KPIs to SDGs?
Existing operational metrics matched to specific SDG targets. Focus on measurable outcomes, not new indicators.

SDG alignment vs ESG?
ESG looks at risks and performance. SDGs focus on contribution to global goals. Different lenses, overlapping data.

How to report SDG impact?
Explain SDG selection. Show KPIs, baselines, and progress over time. Keep methods transparent.

What is SDG washing?
Using SDGs for visibility without evidence. Too many goals, weak data, no targets or trade-offs.

‍